Why CSP is better than Enterprise Agreement?

In today’s competitive landscape, is your organisation leveraging the most strategic Microsoft licensing model?

Microsoft Direct Licensing versus Cloud Service Provider Selling Microsoft Licenses


– Let’s dissect the Cloud Service Provider model, a flexible choice for dynamic enterprises.
– Contrastingly, the Enterprise Agreement offers a traditional, volume-based licensing approach.
– CSP shines with its pay-as-you-go model, ensuring you only pay for what you use.
– EA’s upfront commitment can lead to over-licensing, a costly scenario for any organisation.
– CSP’s scalability is a game-changer, allowing rapid adjustment to your evolving needs.
– With EA, scaling requires renegotiation, a time-consuming process that can hinder agility.Experts agree, CSP’s modern approach aligns with the agility of today’s digital enterprises.
– The financial flexibility of CSP can lead to significant cost savings over time.
– EA’s predictability is often overshadowed by its lack of responsiveness to market changes.
– CSP empowers you with direct access to the latest Microsoft innovations, as they happen.
– EA may delay your access to new features, potentially impacting your competitive edge.
– CSP’s support ecosystem is tailored to your needs, offering a personalised service experience.
– EA’s one-size-fits-all support may not align with the unique challenges of your organisation.
In conclusion, CSP offers a strategic advantage, aligning with the agility and innovation your enterprise demands.

Stay up-to-date with the latest news on Starlinenews.com and my YouTube channel, Technology Trends. Connect with me directly for the most current insights

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *